課程資訊
課程名稱
建築、環境與社會
Architecture, Environment, and Society 
開課學期
112-2 
授課對象
工學院  建築與城鄉研究所  
授課教師
邱啟新 
課號
BP7229 
課程識別碼
544 M4950 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
工綜311 
備註
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限:25人
外系人數限制:15人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

當建築遇上環境、生態、自然的概念時,很容易讓人聯想到綠建築標章、國際氣候協定的減碳標準,專家透過高科技、自然科學之模擬與實驗數據所苦口婆心建議的發展目標與技術準則,於是永續建築、生態設計似乎是由一套仰賴權威社群、國際認證黃金標準所定義與控制之「專業技術」領域,它們似乎是去政治的,無關地方及社會的,本課程拒絕這類觀點,而認為綠建築與永續都市設計是社會自然裝配之空間表現與地理現象,其中必然有經濟、權力、地方政治、心理文化等作用力,是深富挑戰、爭議與想像之論述空間與實踐場域。

課程介紹綠建築及永續設計之社會科學研究,這些具備實證田野資料之論文,多奠基於都市政治生態學及政治經濟學之批判都市論與社會建構論觀點,對於(綠)建築之社會自然關係、日常生活與物質性之相依互動性,及低碳設計之資本價值與成長意涵,深入正式探討,而非討論科技工程之應用與成效,研讀這些著作讓我們從空間與環境的本質出發,同時解析永續低碳建築之社會心理面向及背後之權力結構,並將其定位在都市與地區發展之脈絡。課程一方面就思考探究理論概念,同時著重實務應用之解析詮釋、對話國內外相關建築/環境設計策略、空間模式、政策制度,現象事件中關於低碳、節能與生態建築,與其永續發展之實踐、倡議與爭議。
 

課程目標
探討影響綠建築、永續設計、低碳住宅之政策、政體、設計規範之政治經濟脈絡,與制度與實作如何與地方、社區與民眾日常生活之文化與社會實踐交相影響,理解科技、技術與設計策略的社會建構特性,分析形塑低碳建築多重尺度的動力--它既受權力、經濟等結構性力量牽引控制,也受到城市形塑過程中,漸進的、日常的、微小的的社會關係與行為表現左右,展現出調適、抵抗,協作,妥協等樣態,既而出現成功、失敗與折衷的永續轉型結果。教學具體目標為:
❑ 建立對建築環境議題批判性分析的理論系統與研究架構。
❑ 比較全球南方與北方(或歐美與亞洲)經驗,反思當前永續建築論述之侷限與排除性。
❑ 掌握、熟悉低碳、節能、韌性之建築與都市設計論述與設計爭議。
❑ 結合理論與個案研究,培養與深化政策倡議分析能力與興趣。
 
課程要求
❑ 教材之導讀報告(有※記號者) 20%
❑ 導讀之主對話提問(個人或兩人一組在自己負責日之外選一次) 10%
❑ 回饋筆記一篇(可針對篇或單元寫) 20%
❑ 期末報告(末頁說明): 能初步發展出一項建築環境議題之研究構想,包含研究問題、理論初步分析、界定研究對象/場域現存之理論或實務上的爭議、課題或困境。30%
❑ 課堂參與出席 20%

 
預期每週課後學習時數
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
❖ 課程進度與教材
02/22引言、課程介紹與作業說明Introduction

02/29 建築之環境社會理論 Critical theories and other social theories about architecutre

Blok, A. (2013). Urban Green Assemblages: An ANT View on Sustainable City Building Projects. Science & Technology Studies 26(1), 5-24.

Cidell, J. (2009). A political ecology of the built environment: LEED certification for green buildings. Local Environment, 14(7), 621-633.

Guy, S., & Farmer, G. (2001). Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: The Place of Technology. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3), 140-148.

Maier, J. R. A., Fadel, G. M., & Battisto, D. G. (2009). An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30(4), 393-414.

Noah Quastel (2016): Ecological Political Economy: Towards a Strategic-Relational Approach, Review of Political Economy, 28(3), 336-353

延伸閱讀:

Müller, A. L., & Reichmann, W. (2015). Architecture, materiality and society : Connecting sociology of architecture with science and technology studies. United States: Palgrave MacMillan.

Marcus, L., Giusti, M., & Barthel, S. (2016). Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: Contributions of space syntax and spatial cognition. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 439-452.

Spinks, M. (2011). Adoption of a network approach to sustainable building standard process, not product: a response column to 'A political-ecology of the built environment: LEED certification for green buildings', Local Environment, 16(1), 87-92.

Sovacool, B. K. (2006). Reactors, Weapons, X-Rays, and Solar Panels: Using SCOT, Technological Frame, Epistemic Culture, and Actor Network Theory to Investigate Technology. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(1), 4-14.

03/07 生態現代化(之侷限) (The limits to) Ecological modernization

※F.H. Buttel (2000). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31, 57-65.

 Gibbs, D. (2000) Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and Regional Development Agencies. Geoforum 31, 9-19.

※Jesse Rodenbiker (2021): Making Ecology Developmental: China’s Environmental Sciences and Green Modernization in Global Context, Annals of the American Association of Geographers

黃信勳、徐世榮 (2014)。戰後臺灣的環境治理進路:一個生態現代化視角的考察, 思與言,52 (4), 5-63。


延伸閱讀:
Evans, P., 1995. Embedded Autonomy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Evans, P., 1996. Government action, social capital, and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development 24, 1119- 1132.


03/14 人類世下之環境設計、物質與科技

※Gandy, M. (2003). Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

※Monstadt, J. (2009). Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: insights from technology and urban studies. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1924-1942.

※Swyngedouw, E, N Heynen and M Kaika (2006). Urban Political Ecology: Politicizing the Production of Urban Natures. In Heynen N., Kaika M., and Swyngedouw E, (Ed.). In the Nature of Cities – Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London: Routledge .

曾裕淇、徐進鈺(2016)。永續發展 一個都市政治生態學的批判性視角。地理學報,(82),1-25。
延伸閱讀:
Gandy, M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 26-49.

Lawhon, M., Ernstson, H., & Silver, J. (2014). Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African urbanism. Antipode, 46(2), 497-516.

03/21辯證建築與都市設計之自然與社會關係 UPE and posthumanism, ANT perspectives

※ Edwards GAS, Bulkeley H. (2017). Urban political ecologies of housing and climate change: The ‘Coolest Block’ Contest in Philadelphia. Urban Studies. 54(5):1126-1141

※Connolly, C. (2019). Urban political ecologies of heritage: Integrating cultural and natural landscapes in Penang, Malaysia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45 (1). pp. 168-180

邱啟新(2015)。綠色堡壘: 台北新圓環之綠活論述、自然再現與偽公共空間。建築學報,91,99-118。

03/28 綠設計與低碳住宅的社會物質互動 Green and low carbon designs

※Jocoy, C. L. (2018). Green growth machines? Competing discourses of urban development in Playa Vista, California. Urban Geography 39(3), 388-412.

※Walker, G., Karvonen, A., & Guy, S. (2015). Zero carbon homes and zero carbon living: sociomaterial interdependencies in carbon governance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(4), 494-50.

※Broto, V. C., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). Maintaining climate change experiments: Urban political ecology and the everyday reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 37(6), 1934-1948.

延伸閱讀:

Chatterton, P. (2016) Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

吳嘉苓(2015)。永久屋前搭涼棚:災後家屋重建的建築設計與社會改造,科技、醫療與社會,20:9- 74。

黃昱翔(2016)。維護之重要:住宅綠建築的社會與技術特性。國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究 所碩士論文,台北市。

4/04 春假

04/11 回饋心得報告 (期中周)


04/18地方政府綠建築政策,政策移動Municipal green building policies, policy mobilities

※Cidell, J. (2015). Performing leadership: municipal green building policies and the city as role model. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy; 33(3):566-579.

※Faulconbridge, J. (2015). Mobilising sustainable building assessment models: agents, strategies and local effects. Area, 47(2), 116-123.

※Pow, C. P. (2014) License to travel, City, 18(3), 287-306.


04/25綠建築與市場導向標準 Green building, market standards

※Faulconbridge, J., Cass, N., & Connaughton, J. (2018). How market standards affect building design: The case of low energy design in commercial offices. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(3), 627-650.

※Cidell, J. & Cope, M. A. (2014) Factors explaining the adoption and impact of LEED-based green building policies at the municipal level, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (12), 1763-1781.

※Dilworth, R., & Stokes, R. (2012). Green growth machines, LEED ratings and value free development: The case of the philadelphia property tax abatement. Journal of Urbanism, 6(1), 1-15.

推薦閱讀:
Nielsen, S. B. Quitzau, B. H. & Elle, M. (2009). Mobilizing the Courage to Implement Sustainable Design Solutions: Danish Experiences. Architecture Engineering and Design Management, 5(1), 53-61.


05/02(1) 都市綠化、綠屋頂與都市意象性Vertical greenery, green roofs and urban imaginaries

Angelo, H. Added value? Denaturalizing the “good” of urban greening. Geography Compass. 2019

※Cidell, J. (2017). Sustainable imaginaries and the green roof on Chicago’s City Hall. Geoforum(86), 169-176.

※Han, H. (2017). Singapore, a Garden City: Authoritarian environmentalism in a developmental state. The Journal of Environment & Development, 26(1), 3-24.

推薦閱讀:

Zimmer, A., Cornea, N., & Véron, R. (2017). Of parks and politics: The production of socio-nature in a Gujarati town. Local Environment, 22(1), 49-66.

05/02(2) 非正式性與氣候治理 informality and climate governance

※Chiu, C. (2023). Greening informality through metabolic coordination: An urban political ecology of governing extralegal housing forms in Taiwan. Urban Studies, DOI: 10.1177/00420980231202684

Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J., & Brand, A. L. (2018). From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life. City 22(3), 417-436.


※Jabeen, H. & Guy, S. (2015). Fluid engagements: Responding to the co-evolution of poverty and climate change in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Habitat International, 47, 307-314.

05/09生態城、永續性修補 Eco city, sustainability fix

※Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an Agenda for Post-carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK's First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community. [Article]. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 37(5), 1654-1674.

※Chang, I-CC.(2017). Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2017;49(8):1719-1742.

※While, A., Jonas, A. E.G., & Gibbs, D. (2004). The Environment and the Entrepreneurial City: Searching for the Urban “Sustainability Fix” in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28. 3: 549-69.


延伸閱讀:

邱啟新(2020年06月)。非正式城市之永續性修補:高雄市違章住宅轉型之 空間與環境策略。都市與計畫,47(2), 111-148。

Caprotti, F. (2014). Eco-urbanism and the Eco-city, or, denying the right to the City? Antipode, 46(5), 1285-1303.

Pow, C. P., & Neo, H. (2015). Modelling green urbanism in China. Area, 47(2), 132–140.

05/16 新能源、建築與公民電廠 Renewable energy, buildings, and community solar

※Chiu, C. (2023). Toward a State-led, Market-Enabled Commons: Positioning Urban Civic Energy in East Asia. Urban Affairs Review, DOI: 10.1177/10780874231216038

※Fernando, D. R., Herreros, F., &Uriel, L. (2013). Technifying Public Space and Publicizing Infrastructures: Exploring New Urban Political Ecologies through the Square of General Vara del Rey. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 37, 3, 1035-1052.

Yu Z, Gibbs D.(2020). Unravelling the role of green entrepreneurs in urban sustainability transitions: A case study of China’s Solar City. Urban Studies, 57(14):2901-2917.

※Chan, G., Evans, I. & Grimley, M., Ihde, B., & Mazumder, P. (2017). Design choices and equity implications of community shared solar, The Electricity Journal, 30(9), 7-41,

林子倫、李宜卿(2017)。再生能源政策在地實踐之探討:以 高雄市推動屋頂型太陽光電為例。公共行政學報,第52期,第39-80頁。

延伸閱讀:

陳穎峯、高淑芬(2019)。公民電廠:能源轉型的四種聚焦。出自周桂田等(2019)著。日常生活的能源革命。台北:春山。


05/23 期末報告

05/30 期末報告

06/06 期末考周 (彈性周)





作業說明

*導讀
導讀要求: (20-30分鐘,需做簡報,並於課前上傳)
一、內文之重點摘要報告:
 作者之研究目的與主要發問
 理論架構與理論基礎(或回顧文獻之範疇為何)
 核心發現或所辯證之觀點

二、實踐與延伸
舉例國內或亞洲相關案例(可以是設計、規劃、現象、事件、制度、政策、法規或地方等),與論文觀點加以對話、比較

延伸文章、書籍推薦簡介(中英文可)

*對話

主對話要求: (10-15分鐘,口頭,無需做簡報)
 對論文之感想與看法分享
 提出自我見解或疑問與導讀者討論、對話

*期末報告
選擇一項建築環境議題,可為時事、政策、設計、規劃等,應用所教授之理論概念,深入分析,內容包含前言、文獻理論回顧、課題與爭議討論,以及理論性之分析,可包含具實務性之建議。

 
參考書目
see syllabus 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式
 
上課形式
作業繳交方式
考試形式
其他
由師生雙方議定
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/22  詳以上課程大綱